Fischer v. United States: Evaluating Sarbanes-Oxley in Non-Corporate Applications
On a chill December evening in 1773, a group of Boston revolutionaries boarded a merchant ship, dumping over three hundred chests of tea overboard in an act of defiance against British taxation. While the Boston Tea party was immortalized in the American mythos, it would be only the first of many protests in America’s history, from the Stonewall riots to the Vietnam War demonstrations, to shape freedoms and politics.
U.S. v. Daren W. Phillips: Search and Seizure in the Digital Age
In the digital age, the intersection between privacy rights and law enforcement’s investigatory power presents complex legal challenges, particularly concerning the contents of personal electronic devices. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. Yet, the parameters of these protections become blurred when differentiating under what circumstances can personal data from digital devices be used as evidence.
The Wolves Who Cried “Unconstitutional”: The Issue of The National Labor
Many companies’ workers have exercised their rights to collectively organize and bargain – a right bestowed to them under the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Aside from ensuring these rights be available to workers across the United States, the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 also established the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) – a government agency designed specifically to enforce employees’ rights and adjudicate their disputes. However, a death sentence may be imposed on almost 90 years of the NLRB’s authority and commitment to workers’ rights have recently come together to raise their swords against the federal agency’s constitutionality.
The Supreme Court’s Neglected Power Grab: Immigration
Chevron U.S.A Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Inc. (1984) has been a framework of review applied by the courts toward the practices of administrative agencies for nearly four decades. What has this doctrine come to mean? Why do some argue that overturning it represents another Supreme Court power grab, and how can the Court’s recent treatment of it compare to its treatment of immigration deference?
Juvenile Justice in the United States: A Historical Analysis
Adolescence is the most impressionable period of human life where an emphasis is placed on providing children with guidance and strong values to become law-abiding citizens. However, not all children are afforded the privilege of having strong leaders and mentors, which significantly contributes to delinquent behaviors. Combined with trauma, neglect, and other social factors that increase opportunities for delinquent behavior, it is easy for children to fall into the criminal justice system.
Razor Dividing the Nation: The Texas Border Crisis
“Come and take it!” is a historic Texan battle slogan that remains a symbol of defiance in contemporary times. Due to the recent border issues between Texas and the federal government, there have been flags with this slogan lining the US-Mexico border. In 2021, Greg Abbott, the Governor of Texas, ordered razor wire to be placed along the US-Mexico border, but recently, these orders have caused chaos and division in the United States.
Anti-Homelessness Policies on the Supreme Court’s Doorstep: Will the Court's Decision Make Room for Everybody?
In the 2024 election year, affordability has climbed its way to the top of American voters’ political priorities. With inflation impacting the prices of everyday goods, coupled with the expiration of COVID-19 era financial relief programs, it is no question that the burden of cost is affecting Americans’ livelihoods, posing a serious threat to housing stability.
Kangaroo Court
Forty years and ten months ago, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) was created by the U.S. Department of Justice. The immigration courts under the EOIR have the task of adjudicating the cases of detained individuals in the United States facing removal or deportation proceedings and ultimately decide whether or not an individual should be allowed to stay in the United States. Last year, a piece of legislation was introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives and it sought the establishment of U.S immigration courts independent from the Department of Justice.
International Humanitarian Law: The Case of Nagorno-Karabakh
Ten days after the launch of the "anti-terrorist operation," Armenia submitted a request for an “indication of provisional measures, ‘to preserve and protect rights enshrined in the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (‘CERD’).” In reference to 1993 United Nations Resolutions, the Geneva Conventions, and the pending ICJ court decision, this article will look at applications of international humanitarian law.