While many Americans are quick to adjust to the pace of societal advancement, the American workforce is not as prompt in adapting to society’s myriad of changes. Rapid technological advancements, coupled with the growing wage disparity between employers and employees, have sprouted issues that continue to plague the workforce. However, in attempts for these issues to be remediated, workers have left the workplace doors and found their way into the picket lines and are leaving demands atop many CEO’s desks, as workers have collectively organized to demand change. This past summer, organized labor has reclaimed its spot at the forefront of the American Agenda. Many labor unions, from the United Auto Workers to the Writers’ Guild of America, have gathered their members together in a fight for a fair workplace. However, amidst the many strikes that erupted over the summer of 2023, the Supreme Court decided on a case that holds the potential to upend organized labor, and erode the right to strike.

As the 2024 election cycle ramps up, one of the main Republican contenders, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, has waged a war on “woke” culture. Parts of “woke” culture that have been scrutinized are feminist studies, gender and sexuality studies, and black and african american studies. In June 2021, the Board of Education in Florida banned Critical Race Theory, putting it in the same category as the Holocaust for being “theories that distort historical events.” In March 2022, the Florida legislature passed the Don’t Say Gay Bill. In January 2023, the AP course on African and American studies was banned in Florida high schools.

In April 2022, the Individual Freedom Act, also nicknamed Stop Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees (WOKE) Act, was signed by DeSantis. With this act, any instruction that makes certain parties feel “personal responsibility” for historic events is illegal for businesses and teachers. The most widely advertised component of the Stop WOKE Act is its alleged ability to eliminate the teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in K-12 education and corporate employee training programs in the state of Florida.

Hunched over the illumination provided by gas light, Louis Brandeis struggled. His eyesight had begun to worsen, the large volume of required reading for his legal studies and the poor illumination provided by those same gas lights had taken their toll.In his legal practice, Brandeis would earn the label of “The People’s Lawyer,” successfully leading fights to maintain public control of Boston’s transportation, consolidate the utility companies in the area, and even began to promote the idea of state unemployment insurance. The case of Muller v. Oregon (1908) would see Brandeis’ first appearance before the United States Supreme Court; it is before this courtroom that Brandeis would provide a brief relying more on social and scientific data than on legal citations. Later known as the Brandeis brief, this style of briefing before the Court would play a major role in cases like Brown v. Board of Education (1954), where the need to demonstrate the harm of segregated education was paramount.

The June 29th SCOTUS decision of Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), Inc v. President and Fellows of Harvard College striking down affirmative action brought forth nationwide controversy regarding the basis of discrimination. The end to affirmative action, a government-approved and voluntary private program granting opportunities to minorities, alters the path and definition of legal discrimination defined in previous SCOTUS decisions. Furthermore, the Court’s opinion delivered on June 29th, 2023 was divided among a majority, a concurring, and a dissenting opinion. The varying conclusions drawn by SCOTUS, while a current topic of discussion for the American public, can be clarified with historical relevance and current implications.

My name is Vanessa Aponte, and I’ve had the pleasure of serving as the Editor-in-Chief of UNLV’s Undergraduate Law Review for the past 2½ years. As graduation approaches, I have been reflecting on this organization and my time leading it. I remember when I first found ULR in the Involvement Center, searching for any clubs that had the word “law” in it. Amidst a pandemic and a severe bout of imposter syndrome, the newly-founded Undergraduate Law Review spoke to me. I applied for a leadership position and, even after underestimating my ability, I was given the opportunity to serve as an inaugural Associate Editor. After months of editing articles and helping writers through the process, my dedication was rewarded with the position of Editor-in-Chief. The rest is history.

In 1839, someone reading a copy of the New York Sun may have noticed an advertisement addressed to married women from a physician named “Madame Restell,” claiming to have medicine that would “alleviate private difficulties” and “remove obstructions.” After mailing Madame Restell a few dollars, a person would receive a powder or some pills that contained ingredients such as pennyroyal, black draught, ergot of rye, and motherwort. These ingredients sound like a recipe from Hocus Pocus, but Madame Restell was no witch. She was an abortion provider almost two centuries ago, infamously dubbed the “Wickedest Woman in New York” due to her services. Despite her notoriety, Madame Restell’s practice shows just how prevalent the issue of abortion has been over time. Abortion is defined as the intentional termination of a pregnancy and, as far back as 1550 BCE, humans have managed unwanted pregnancies by obtaining abortions. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reported about 620,000 abortions in 2020, or roughly 11 abortions for every 1,000 women ages 15-44. The legality of abortion in the United States used to be protected under Roe v. Wade (1973), but after the recent Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), Americans no longer have a federally protected right to abortion under the U.S. Constitution. This new ruling upended 50 years of precedent and triggered a wave of abortion bans across the country. As abortion becomes criminalized again in many states, it is imperative to understand the history of reproductive rights in the U.S. and the troubling legal concerns that arise in a post-Roe America.

One of the purposes of law in civil society is, arguably, to protect the general safety and welfare of all people. Laws that protect human safety may be associated with those that prevent bodily harm or wrongdoings such as robbery or murder. Bodily harm, however, can also be a result of unsafe practices such as the unsanitary handling of food. In that case, laws are developed and implemented to promote food safety. While associations with the law are not often correlated to healthcare, nearly all commonplace civilian protections towards health and safety are guaranteed to society through a specific area of the law – health law. As described by Harvard Law, “health lawyers work on cases and policy relating to access to care, insurance coverage, difficult ethical choices, providers of care, the safety of our drugs and food supply, disease prevention and treatment” and many other complex healthcare-related issues. As a result of health law and policies implemented over the last century, people can enjoy longer, healthier lives. The history surrounding this type of law has not always been constructive. In today’s world, there exist many laws and policies that govern the healthcare world that threaten to discriminate against members of society, subsequently worsening healthcare outcomes.

Everything a celebrity does becomes part of the public eye in a matter of minutes. While celebrities try to keep their private life under wraps, the hopes of this happening usually fails. Pirates of the Caribbean star Johnny Depp and Aquaman star Amber Heard were no exception. Johnny Depp and Amber Heard have been caught up in a public scandal ever since their divorce in 2017. In the case of John C. Depp, II, v. Amber Laura Heard (2022), Johnny Depp (the plaintiff) sued former wife Amber Heard (the defendant) on grounds of defamation. Defamation is a false statement or claim that harms someone else’s reputation. There are two types of defamation – slander, which is in oral form, and libel, which is in written form. This accusation arose when Amber Heard wrote an op-ed for the New York Times. She wrote this article from the perspective of someone who was a victim of domestic abuse and later stated how she “felt the full force of our culture's wrath for women who speak out.” She never mentioned anyone by name in the article, but it was clear to Johnny Depp that it was about him…